European judgment on displays of religious faith in the workplace doesn’t offer clear cut guidance to employers

blog-publish-date

18 Jan 2013

blog-read-duration

  London 16 January 2013 – With the European Court of Human Rights ruling in favour of British Airways worker Nadia Eweida, Croner  is warning bosses to have robust, justifiable reasons for restricting the wearing of displays of religious faith such as crosses. Four cases of religious discrimination were heard at the European Court of Human Rights yesterday. Of the four, three were found not to be violating the rights of the employee. The fourth however was deemed to have had her rights violated under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Liz Iles, Senior Employment Consultant at Croner says: “The decisions in the case of Eweida & Others v UK today shows that there must be a balance between an employee’s wish to display their religious beliefs and a sound rationale why they might be restricted. “What this means in practice is that employers must have good justifiable reasons why, for example, employees can’t wear a cross at work. A good example of this is demonstrated by a connected case heard at the ECHR today. Nurse Shirley Chaplin was told by her employer that she couldn’t wear her cross around her neck as it posed a health and safety risk. This was held to be a legitimate justifiable reason. “The ECHR decision in the case of Nadia Eweida was based on special circumstances, including the fact that a discreet cross would not have adversely affected British Airways’ public image. “While these court judgements may be hard for bosses to interpret when making controversial decisions, for many employers it will make it easier to agree to employee requests rather than risk a complaint. However, employers are advised to explore all options available to them as alternatives when faced with an objection from an employee, especially as sensitive as one related to their religion or belief. “What is not apparent in the ECHR decision is the position in relation to third parties. For example, it may be that a member of the public or a colleague might be offended by the display of religious faith and may themselves make complaints.” Croner provides expert information and advice for employers on a wide range of employment and health and safety issues. Contact us on 0800 634 1700 for further information on our products and services.

Free to Download Employer Resources

  • Social Media Policy Template

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Social Media Policy Template

    Read more
  • Sample Mental Health Policy

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Sample Mental Health Policy

    Read more
  • Disciplinary Letter Template

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Disciplinary Letter Template

    Read more
  • 10 Tips About Your Workforce and Bank Holidays

    BLOG

    10 Tips About Your Workforce and Bank...

    Do you have employees who work over bank holidays?  Public holidays raise all so...

    Read more
  • Top Five Things to Remember When Recruiting

    BLOG

    Top Five Things to Remember When Recr...

    Although finding the appropriate person for a role is challenging, getting thing...

    Read more
  • EU Ruling Forces UK Bosses to Record Staff Work Hours

    BLOG

    EU Ruling Forces UK Bosses to Record ...

    The European Court of Justice has ruled that bosses must have a system in place ...

    Read more
  • Numark

    CASE STUDY

    Numark

    Numark serve as a virtual head office for independent pharmacies on the high str...

    Read more
  • Gilmour Quinn

    CASE STUDY

    Gilmour Quinn

    Gilmour Quinn Financial Planning Ltd is, as the name suggests, a small financial...

    Read more
  • Wardman Brown

    CASE STUDY

    Wardman Brown

    "I would say it has has a noticeable impact, in particular it has improved the H

    Read more

Ready to focus on what you do best?

Get your free consultation and speak to an expert today.