European judgment on displays of religious faith in the workplace doesn’t offer clear cut guidance to employers

blog-publish-date

18 Jan 2013

blog-read-duration

  London 16 January 2013 – With the European Court of Human Rights ruling in favour of British Airways worker Nadia Eweida, Croner  is warning bosses to have robust, justifiable reasons for restricting the wearing of displays of religious faith such as crosses. Four cases of religious discrimination were heard at the European Court of Human Rights yesterday. Of the four, three were found not to be violating the rights of the employee. The fourth however was deemed to have had her rights violated under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Liz Iles, Senior Employment Consultant at Croner says: “The decisions in the case of Eweida & Others v UK today shows that there must be a balance between an employee’s wish to display their religious beliefs and a sound rationale why they might be restricted. “What this means in practice is that employers must have good justifiable reasons why, for example, employees can’t wear a cross at work. A good example of this is demonstrated by a connected case heard at the ECHR today. Nurse Shirley Chaplin was told by her employer that she couldn’t wear her cross around her neck as it posed a health and safety risk. This was held to be a legitimate justifiable reason. “The ECHR decision in the case of Nadia Eweida was based on special circumstances, including the fact that a discreet cross would not have adversely affected British Airways’ public image. “While these court judgements may be hard for bosses to interpret when making controversial decisions, for many employers it will make it easier to agree to employee requests rather than risk a complaint. However, employers are advised to explore all options available to them as alternatives when faced with an objection from an employee, especially as sensitive as one related to their religion or belief. “What is not apparent in the ECHR decision is the position in relation to third parties. For example, it may be that a member of the public or a colleague might be offended by the display of religious faith and may themselves make complaints.” Croner provides expert information and advice for employers on a wide range of employment and health and safety issues. Contact us on 0800 634 1700 for further information on our products and services.

Free to Download Employer Resources

  • Model Apprenticeship Agreement

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Model Apprenticeship Agreement

    Read more
  • Sample COSHH Assessment Record

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Sample COSHH Assessment Record

    Read more
  • Return to Work Interview Form

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Return to Work Interview Form

    Read more
  • BLOG

    Avoiding Slips, Trips and Falls in th...

    Whether your staff is in an office or on a construction site, every workplace ha...

    Read more
  • BLOG

    Daylight Saving Time: The Implication...

    Daylight Saving Time is coming to an end on Sunday 27 October, with the clocks g...

    Read more
  • BLOG

    Top Tips to De-escalate Conflict

    Conflict can take many forms. Whatever the nature of the conflict, it's in your...

    Read more
  • REC

    CASE STUDY

    REC

    The events are brilliant. Amanda Chadwick, one of the expert speakers, is a very

    Read more
  • Grantley Hall

    CASE STUDY

    Grantley Hall

    Whenever we have a sensitive issue - sometimes involving individuals with protec

    Read more
  • Lady Heyes Holiday Park

    CASE STUDY

    Lady Heyes Holiday Park

    Overall it's definitely had a noticeable impact on the business and how I perfor

    Read more

Do you have any questions?

Get a free callback from one of our regional experts today