Uber Drivers are Workers Rules Employment Tribunal

blog-publish-date

01 Nov 2016

blog-read-duration

Today, an Employment Tribunal has made the landmark decision that the drivers of taxi giant Uber are to be classed as workers and not self-employed. The test case, brought forward by James Farrar and Yaseen Aslam, forms one of the first proper legal reviews of job status in this part of the gig economy, and has the potential to form a new paradigm.

Background

Two drivers brought a claim against the renowned company, claiming that they had been denied basic rights, including the payment of the National Minimum Wage, holiday and sick pay. Kevin Gibson, Specialist HR Consultant at Croner, states: “This is a seminal case for Uber and other organisations who engage individuals on similar terms, therefore we expect a torrent of claims from other industries - the roads of the UK are awash with courier and food delivery firms operating similarly practices to the Uber model.“

What the ruling means

Under this ruling, Uber will have to adhere to paying and providing the workers’ statutory rights, including, but not restricted to: 5.6 weeks’ paid annual leave annually; a maximum 48 hour average working week; payment satisfying the National Minimum Wage, and more. However, the Employment Tribunal did not find these Claimants were ‘employees’ for Uber, therefore they will not meet that requirement to make certain claims such as unfair dismissal, or protection under the TUPE Regulations. Amanda Beattie, Litigation Manager at Croner adds: “There is a plethora of case law regarding employment status; however the fundamental factor is that the Employment Tribunal will look at the agreement between the parties and the circumstances to assess whether status of the individual is consistent with being an employee, worker or self-employed contractor. Effectively they will look at the irreducible minimum of obligations; employment tends to need mutual obligations, whereas the worker definition tends to concentrate on the element of personal service by the individual.” Uber had tried to argue that all of their 40,000 drivers were self-employed, but the tribunal has ultimately ruled in the claimant’s favour. Uber has said that it will appeal the decision.

Victory for drivers

The GMB union described the ruling concerning the ride-hailing app as a "monumental victory" for the drivers.

Free to Download Employer Resources

  • How To Guide: Helping Employees with the EU Settlement Scheme

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    How To Guide: Helping Employees with ...

    Read more
  • Sample Risk Assessment Template

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Sample Risk Assessment Template

    Read more
  • Upcoming Employment Law Changes - 2019/20

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Upcoming Employment Law Changes - 201...

    Read more
  • Tribunal Quarterly Statistics Analysis

    BLOG

    Tribunal Quarterly Statistics Analysi...

    Last week, the Ministry of Justice released the quarterly statistics for employm...

    Read more
  • How Does Time in Lieu Work?

    BLOG

    How Does Time in Lieu Work?

    You’ll most commonly use time off in lieu (TOIL) when you require employees to w...

    Read more
  • Corporate Manslaughter: What You Need to Know

    BLOG

    Corporate Manslaughter: What You Need...

    Until 2008, it was both difficult and rare to convict a corporation for a crimin...

    Read more
  • Solicitors Benevolent Association

    CASE STUDY

    Solicitors Benevolent Association

    “The reason for using Croner was the high-profile track record and the credibili

    Read more
  • John Taylor Hospice

    CASE STUDY

    John Taylor Hospice

    “A large number of the queries are around employment law and rights in areas suc

    Read more
  • Motorsport Industry Association

    CASE STUDY

    Motorsport Industry Association

    “I’m so happy with the service Croner provide, I’d be hard pressed to find a fau

    Read more

Ready to focus on what you do best?

Get your free consultation and speak to an expert today.