Is it whistleblowing if you make an allegation?

blog-publish-date

14 Jun 2016

blog-read-duration

Amanda Beattie, Regional Litigation Manager at Croner, looks at whether allegations regarding an employer can be a valid protected disclosure for a whistleblowing claim, following the case of Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth heard recently at the Employment Appeal Tribunal. Whistleblowing claims are relatively common in the Employment Tribunal and arises when a worker alleges that they have a suffered a detriment, (which can include being dismissed) because they have made a protected disclosure. Legislation provides specific criteria in relation to what a protected disclosure involves, which includes:

  • The disclosure of information which is in the reasonable belief of the worker, is made in the public interest and tends to show a criminal offence has been committed; a person has failed or will fail to comply with a legal obligation; a miscarriage of justice has or will occur; health and safety of any person has or will be endangered; the environment has or is likely to be damaged or any of the preceding issues has or is likely to be concealed;
  • The disclosure is made to the employer or other responsible person and in certain circumstances to other prescribed persons outlined in the legislation.
In the current case, the Claimant was employed as a manager by the London Borough of Wandsworth’s education authority. The Claimant issued a whistleblowing claim asserting that she had made four protected disclosures and because of these disclosures, she had suffered detriment, which included her dismissal. The third alleged protected disclosure was a letter from the Claimant’s solicitor to her employer, which alleged that they were failing in their legal obligations in regard to implementing their bullying and harassment policy and procedure and that there had been 'numerous incidents of inappropriate behavior towards me, including repeated sidelining'. The Employment Tribunal determined that none of the four disclosures met the criteria of being a protected disclosure and her claim was dismissed. In relation to the third alleged protected disclosure, the Tribunal considered that the solicitor letter was not a matter of information but was an allegation. The Claimant appealed this decision to the EAT. The EAT held that within the legislation there is no distinct separation between the words of “information” and “allegation” and therefore, the question for the Employment Tribunal is whether it is a disclosure of information and even if this information can also be construed as an allegation, then that is of no significance.  However, in the present case in relation to the third allegation, the EAT found that the Employment Tribunal were correct in concluding that the solicitor’s letter was not conveying information, as it said nothing specific. Further, even in the event it was construed as conveying information, it did not allege a criminal offence or any other matter which fulfilled the criteria for a protected disclosure. Accordingly, the Claimant’s appeal was dismissed. Consequently, this case provides helpful guidance to Tribunals in relation to what is and is not of significance in relation to what is contained in alleged protected disclosure. In that, even if the information is also an allegation, it can still be providing information for the purposes of a whistleblowing claim, if specific facts are conveyed which tend to show the areas outlined above.

Free to Download Employer Resources

  • Grievance Policy Guide & Template

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Grievance Policy Guide & Template

    Read more
  • Sickness Absence Policy & Procedure

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Sickness Absence Policy & Procedure

    Read more
  • Bribery Risk Assessment Form

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Bribery Risk Assessment Form

    Read more
  • BLOG

    EHRC Release anti-harassment guidance

    New guidance has been released for employers on preventing harassment at work. T...

    Read more
  • BLOG

    New Minimum Wage Rates Announced

    2020 is set to be one of the busiest years yet for employment law developments.T...

    Read more
  • BLOG

    Ethical Veganism is a Philosophical B...

    Under the Equality Act 2010, it’s unlawful to discriminate against an individual...

    Read more
  • Print Inc.

    CASE STUDY

    Print Inc.

    Print Inc. are an embroidery and print company based in Carmarthenshire, South W...

    Read more
  • Scotgold Resources

    CASE STUDY

    Scotgold Resources

    A lot of organisations believe they’re sitting on a gold mine. Scotgold resource

    Read more
  • Wacoal

    CASE STUDY

    Wacoal

    “Overall, we’re very happy with the service Croner provides and we’d recommend i

    Read more

Do you have any questions?

Get a free callback from one of our regional experts today