Uber Drivers are Workers Rules Employment Tribunal

blog-publish-date

01 Nov 2016

blog-read-duration

Today, an Employment Tribunal has made the landmark decision that the drivers of taxi giant Uber are to be classed as workers and not self-employed. The test case, brought forward by James Farrar and Yaseen Aslam, forms one of the first proper legal reviews of job status in this part of the gig economy, and has the potential to form a new paradigm.

Background

Two drivers brought a claim against the renowned company, claiming that they had been denied basic rights, including the payment of the National Minimum Wage, holiday and sick pay. Kevin Gibson, Specialist HR Consultant at Croner, states: “This is a seminal case for Uber and other organisations who engage individuals on similar terms, therefore we expect a torrent of claims from other industries - the roads of the UK are awash with courier and food delivery firms operating similarly practices to the Uber model.“

What the ruling means

Under this ruling, Uber will have to adhere to paying and providing the workers’ statutory rights, including, but not restricted to: 5.6 weeks’ paid annual leave annually; a maximum 48 hour average working week; payment satisfying the National Minimum Wage, and more. However, the Employment Tribunal did not find these Claimants were ‘employees’ for Uber, therefore they will not meet that requirement to make certain claims such as unfair dismissal, or protection under the TUPE Regulations. Amanda Beattie, Litigation Manager at Croner adds: “There is a plethora of case law regarding employment status; however the fundamental factor is that the Employment Tribunal will look at the agreement between the parties and the circumstances to assess whether status of the individual is consistent with being an employee, worker or self-employed contractor. Effectively they will look at the irreducible minimum of obligations; employment tends to need mutual obligations, whereas the worker definition tends to concentrate on the element of personal service by the individual.” Uber had tried to argue that all of their 40,000 drivers were self-employed, but the tribunal has ultimately ruled in the claimant’s favour. Uber has said that it will appeal the decision.

Victory for drivers

The GMB union described the ruling concerning the ride-hailing app as a "monumental victory" for the drivers.

Free to Download Employer Resources

  • Grievance Policy Guide & Template

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Grievance Policy Guide & Template

    Read more
  • Sickness Absence Policy & Procedure

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Sickness Absence Policy & Procedure

    Read more
  • Bribery Risk Assessment Form

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Bribery Risk Assessment Form

    Read more
  • BLOG

    Parental Bereavement Leave Becomes La...

    In 2010, Lucy Herd lost her son Jack. She was shocked to find how little time he...

    Read more
  • BLOG

    Case Law Update - Discrimination Canc...

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has ruled that individuals who have been di...

    Read more
  • BLOG

    EHRC Release anti-harassment guidance

    New guidance has been released for employers on preventing harassment at work. T...

    Read more
  • Print Inc.

    CASE STUDY

    Print Inc.

    Print Inc. are an embroidery and print company based in Carmarthenshire, South W...

    Read more
  • Scotgold Resources

    CASE STUDY

    Scotgold Resources

    A lot of organisations believe they’re sitting on a gold mine. Scotgold resource

    Read more
  • Wacoal

    CASE STUDY

    Wacoal

    “Overall, we’re very happy with the service Croner provides and we’d recommend i

    Read more

Do you have any questions?

Get a free callback from one of our regional experts today