Travel Time Pay Ruling Will Have a Significant Impact on UK Businesses

blog-publish-date

08 Oct 2015

blog-read-duration

A new Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruling could have a significant impact on UK companies employing workers who don’t have a fixed place of work and who travel to and from appointments, says Andrew Willis Head of Croner Litigation at Wolters Kluwer.

The CJEU has ruled that time spent travelling to and from appointments by workers without a fixed place of work should be regarded as ‘working time’ for the purposes of the Working Time Directive. Such arrangements are common in the care and sales sectors, but the case is significant for any business employing people in this way.

Under the UK Working Time Regulations any period during which the worker is working at the employer's disposal, and carrying out his activity or duties, is included in working time. It is common practice for employers to include travel as part of working time if it is an integral part of the job (for example in the case of a travelling sales person), including travel between sites or clients.

However, many employers do not pay for the time spent travelling between the worker’s home and the premises of the first and last customers or clients. Now, in Federación de Servicios Privados del Sindicato Comisiones Obreras v Tyco Integrated Security SL and anor, the CJEU has ruled that if a worker does not have a fixed or habitual place of work, time spent travelling between his or her home and the premises of the first and last customers does constitute ‘working time’. This ruling could have a significant impact on working hours and, particularly for those workers receiving remuneration at or near minimum wage rates, pay – particularly pertinent given the government’s recent living wage announcement.

“While the immediate effect of this decision will be on UK workers employed by the State and State bodies, there is likely to be an early challenge to domestic law, at which point the Working Time Regulations may well be interpreted in a manner consistent with the Court’s decision”, says Mr Willis.

“It would therefore be sensible for employers to seek early advice and consider practically addressing this issue as soon as possible, particularly when reviewing or re-negotiating terms and conditions, so as to ensure compliance with the Working Time Regulations and National Minimum Wage obligations.”

Free to Download Employer Resources

  • Grievance Policy Guide & Template

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Grievance Policy Guide & Template

    Read more
  • Sickness Absence Policy & Procedure

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Sickness Absence Policy & Procedure

    Read more
  • Bribery Risk Assessment Form

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Bribery Risk Assessment Form

    Read more
  • BLOG

    Case Law Update - Misconduct and Miss...

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that there can be circumstances wh...

    Read more
  • BLOG

    Parental Bereavement Leave Becomes La...

    In 2010, Lucy Herd lost her son Jack. She was shocked to find how little time he...

    Read more
  • BLOG

    Case Law Update - Discrimination Canc...

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has ruled that individuals who have been di...

    Read more
  • Print Inc.

    CASE STUDY

    Print Inc.

    Print Inc. are an embroidery and print company based in Carmarthenshire, South W...

    Read more
  • Scotgold Resources

    CASE STUDY

    Scotgold Resources

    A lot of organisations believe they’re sitting on a gold mine. Scotgold resource

    Read more
  • Wacoal

    CASE STUDY

    Wacoal

    “Overall, we’re very happy with the service Croner provides and we’d recommend i

    Read more

Do you have any questions?

Get a free callback from one of our regional experts today