Red Tape Challenge Fails to Hit the Mark with British Businesses

Carol Smith

Carol Smith

blog-publish-date

24 Aug 2018

blog-read-duration

Government Initiative Gets No Confidence Vote in Croner Survey

London 12 February 2014 – The Coalition Government’s three-year campaign to cut red tape has had little or no impact on British businesses, according to new research by Croner, part of Wolters Kluwer, the global business information group.

Over half (52%) of those surveyed by workplace specialist Croner say the measures have had no impact on their business, with a further 41% admitting they are not sure what effect the campaign had.

Just 7% of professionals say that it had some impact on their business.

A selection of the survey responses given are as follows:

  • “I am not aware of one regulation that affects us that has been repealed”;
  • “As far as I am concerned regulation and employment laws only increase”;
  • “Everything seems as complicated as it’s always been”;
  • “We are subject to scrutiny by four different regulators, the local authority, Care Quality Commission, Homes and Communities Agency and the Ombudsman, this number has not changed”.

The survey respondents generally adopted one of two main opinions: those that felt the cuts were not significant enough to impact on business, and those that were unaware of the changes.

However, they did agree that any changes that have been made have been poorly communicated. Richard Smith, Head of Product & Strategy at Croner, says: “The findings of the Croner survey highlight what our clients have been saying to us about the campaign. There hasn’t been the bonfire of regulations that the government promised.

Many of the reductions are in areas that touch customers infrequently, or have been repackaged into consolidating legislation.

That’s because much of the drive towards regulation is EU driven and therefore there is very little that the UK government can do to change those laws. One of the few areas where people could name a change was in employment law, particularly concerning tribunals and TUPE where changes were welcomed.

Commenting on this Carol Smith, Senior Employment Consultant at Croner, says: “Since the introduction of the red tape campaign, the Government has made a number of positive employment law changes, including the introduction of tribunal fees to cut down on speculative claims. However, employers have been saying these have been a nightmare to implement because the Government have waited to the last minute to apply them, in turn creating more confusion for employers.”

Discussing the Government’s commitment to reduce the health and safety burden on business, Stephen Thomas, Safety Technical Consultant at Croner, says: “Despite all the talk of red tape cuts and thousands of pieces of legislation being removed, the key health & safety regulations remain unaffected because they are considered to be fit for purpose as identified by the Government–commissioned Löfstedt* report.

“While the government is strongly promoting its pro-business stance, employers who break health and safety laws are seeing an increase in fines and costs such as the Health and Safety Executive’s Fee for Intervention scheme**; therefore the deregulation headlines should not be seen as a drop in workplace health and safety standards.”

Expert Support

Croner’s experts are here to support businesses with implementing policies and procedures to protect against tribunals, as well as offer expert advice if you have an ongoing grievance or situation where a case is proceeding to tribunal.

To enquire about Croner’s HR or employment tribunal support please call 01455 858 132.

About the Author

Carol Smith

Carol joined Croner in 2001 as an Employment Consultant advising a wide range of clients on all aspects of Employment Law and HR practice. She demonstrates particular expertise in complex disciplinary, grievance matters and reorganisation / redundancy.

linkedin

Carol Smith

Free to Download Employer Resources

  • Model Apprenticeship Agreement

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Model Apprenticeship Agreement

    Read more
  • Sample COSHH Assessment Record

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Sample COSHH Assessment Record

    Read more
  • Return to Work Interview Form

    FREE DOWNLOAD

    Return to Work Interview Form

    Read more
  • Eye Health in the Workplace

    BLOG

    Eye Health in the Workplace

    On average 1000 injuries occur to people’s eyes every day.[1] The best way to p...

    Read more
  • Case Law - Discrimination Outside of Work

    BLOG

    Case Law - Discrimination Outside of ...

    The EAT has held that employers could avoid being liable for discriminatory acts...

    Read more
  • Fire Safety in the Workplace

    BLOG

    Fire Safety in the Workplace

      If you’re reading this, and you’re an employer, you—yes you—are responsible...

    Read more
  • Syalons

    CASE STUDY

    Syalons

    International Syalons is a manufacturer of advanced ceramics, working for variou...

    Read more
  • Pangea Support

    CASE STUDY

    Pangea Support

    We see Croner being integral to our organisation moving forward, and we’d defini

    Read more
  • JC Couriers

    CASE STUDY

    JC Couriers

    With Croner it genuinely feels like they want me to be a success. And I'm happy

    Read more

Do you have any questions?

Get a free callback from one of our regional experts today